Conquest in ranked
-
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sun 30 Jun 2013 11:49
- Contact:
Conquest in ranked
We have all now gotten used to conquest. Make it default mode for ranked pls!
-
- Sergeant Major
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Fri 17 May 2013 03:18
- Contact:
Re: Conquest in ranked
It's essentially economy but with the game even more heavily skewed in the favour of the victor of the initial engagement. I don't see this replacing destruction any time soon, nor do I see why it should. In destruction, the victor is most, if not always the more skilled player. Not so much in conquest, which is as reliant on luck as it is on hordes of cheap units.
Re: Conquest in ranked
Vermillion_Hawk wrote:It's essentially economy but with the game even more heavily skewed in the favour of the victor of the initial engagement. I don't see this replacing destruction any time soon, nor do I see why it should. In destruction, the victor is most, if not always the more skilled player. Not so much in conquest, which is as reliant on luck as it is on hordes of cheap units.
....
Conquest will for sure be presented as new ranked mode,dont know when,but soon.Lot of Eugen guys are ingoing on vacation,outgoing from vacation,so all depends on that i guess,but Conquest WILL be in ranked.L2FP

Re: Conquest in ranked
Drrty-D wrote:Vermillion_Hawk wrote:It's essentially economy but with the game even more heavily skewed in the favour of the victor of the initial engagement. I don't see this replacing destruction any time soon, nor do I see why it should. In destruction, the victor is most, if not always the more skilled player. Not so much in conquest, which is as reliant on luck as it is on hordes of cheap units.
....
Conquest will for sure be presented as new ranked mode,dont know when,but soon.Lot of Eugen guys are ingoing on vacation,outgoing from vacation,so all depends on that i guess,but Conquest WILL be in ranked.L2FP
Perfect!
This will mean even less players in ranked, making the balance issues in this gamemode non relevant for overall balance.

- Bubble slip
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed 22 Aug 2012 11:00
- Location: Toulouse
- Contact:
Re: Conquest in ranked
Drrty-D wrote:Conquest will for sure be presented as new ranked mode,dont know when,but soon.Lot of Eugen guys are ingoing on vacation,outgoing from vacation,so all depends on that i guess,but Conquest WILL be in ranked.L2FP
I hope you're right.
But i hope the maps 'll be adapted before this mode become THE mode.
It's netherless a good news.
Re: Conquest in ranked
Vermillion_Hawk wrote:It's essentially economy but with the game even more heavily skewed in the favour of the victor of the initial engagement. I don't see this replacing destruction any time soon, nor do I see why it should. In destruction, the victor is most, if not always the more skilled player. Not so much in conquest, which is as reliant on luck as it is on hordes of cheap units.
In destruction the victor is the person who camps the best and has a huge radar AA net.
There are so many units that are decent in conquest because they're effective, but too expensive to risk in destruction. Like pretty much any IFV.
-
- First Sergeant
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Wed 10 Oct 2012 17:26
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Conquest in ranked
Kin-Luu wrote:Drrty-D wrote:Vermillion_Hawk wrote:It's essentially economy but with the game even more heavily skewed in the favour of the victor of the initial engagement. I don't see this replacing destruction any time soon, nor do I see why it should. In destruction, the victor is most, if not always the more skilled player. Not so much in conquest, which is as reliant on luck as it is on hordes of cheap units.
....
Conquest will for sure be presented as new ranked mode,dont know when,but soon.Lot of Eugen guys are ingoing on vacation,outgoing from vacation,so all depends on that i guess,but Conquest WILL be in ranked.L2FP
Perfect!
This will mean even less players in ranked, making the balance issues in this gamemode non relevant for overall balance.
You don't know what you're talking about. Neither the other guy who posted.
Destruction rewarding the most skilled player? This is bull (don't moderate me)
The only problem with conquest in some maps is the zones layout, which can be changed so easily and with minor tweaks.
Also, the second problem of conquest is people like you: I will look forward to see you both in any game, ranked or not, conquest or not. I cannot stand people like you on this forum anymore.
go for it eugen, go for it D
Last edited by OpusTheFowl on Tue 13 Aug 2013 16:36, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Language
Reason: Language
Re: Conquest in ranked
Tommoscimmia wrote:I will look forward to see you both in any game, ranked or not, conquest or not. I cannot stand people like you on this forum anymore.
go for it eugen, go for it D
You are welcome to our sealclubbing games.

- Bubble slip
- Master Sergeant
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed 22 Aug 2012 11:00
- Location: Toulouse
- Contact:
Re: Conquest in ranked
The only problem with conquest in some maps is the zones layout, which can be changed so easily and with minor tweaks.
+1
- QuakeRiley
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sat 18 May 2013 02:01
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: Conquest in ranked
Honestly Conquest is no better than Destruction. Their is no way to effectively springboard if the enemy pushes a lot of sectors early on in during a Conquest match, it's GG and even then it ends up with the typical AA and ATGM walls which you find in Destruction anyway.
In Destruction it is hard to turn it around but you can still beat an enemy who pushes hard early on and gets an income advantage.
In Destruction it is hard to turn it around but you can still beat an enemy who pushes hard early on and gets an income advantage.

"...In their Centurions, the 8th Hussars have evolved a new type of tank warfare. They taught us that anywhere a tank can go, is tank country: even the tops of mountains."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests