Give me pls PACT (not Soviet prototype) plane for 80 points, who can one-shot 130p Challenger or 145p Leo2, and survive because of good ECM. Even if he dies, we can have 9 of them in 1980 deck.
If you can't find any - admit that there is a problem
Super Etendard
Super Etendard
Last edited by Romiros on Sat 24 Aug 2013 08:53, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mikeboy
- General
- Posts: 5354
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 21:59
- Location: Democratic People's Republic of Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: Super Etendant
You could have put it in a less confrontational manor but yes it does need a price increase.
Also I like how this thread managed to get the name wrong too.
Also I like how this thread managed to get the name wrong too.
Re: Super Etendant
DDR:
Su-22M4
USSR:
MiG-27
Poland:
Su-22M3
Czechoslovakia:
MiG-23BN
The Super Nintendo won't one shot anything over 12 AV.
Su-22M4
USSR:
MiG-27
Poland:
Su-22M3
Czechoslovakia:
MiG-23BN
The Super Nintendo won't one shot anything over 12 AV.
Re: Super Etendant
Iris wrote:DDR:
Su-22M4
USSR:
MiG-27
Poland:
Su-22M3
Czechoslovakia:
MiG-23BN
The Super Nintendo won't one shot anything over 12 AV.
Su-22M4 cost 105, 8acc/26ap against 16/30 medium ECM 1984
mig-27M 150 (!!!). 8/30 against 16/30
Su-22M3 95, 8/28 against 16/30 Bad ECM
Mig-23BN 100 8/28 against 16/30 bad ECM
They're more expensive, do less damage, and have less chances to survival
Re: Super Etendard
I agree with Romiros that this unit is a bit of a problem 
. Looking at those numbers, and having used the listed planes for comparison, the Super Nintendo is just plain superior to its peers.
I think a big part of it is that having a single missile isnt a bad thing when nowadays most players evac after firing a single missile anyways. It just helps boost the aircraft's survivability even more. Its very concerning IMO when an aircraft is better than its peers because it willingly carries less payload...
. Looking at those numbers, and having used the listed planes for comparison, the Super Nintendo is just plain superior to its peers. I think a big part of it is that having a single missile isnt a bad thing when nowadays most players evac after firing a single missile anyways. It just helps boost the aircraft's survivability even more. Its very concerning IMO when an aircraft is better than its peers because it willingly carries less payload...
Re: Super Etendard
Guggy wrote:I agree with Romiros that this unit is a bit of a problem
general buff of ECM on all (most of) PACT planes can fix some troubles.
Re: Super Etendard
CSSR Mig-23BN and DDR Su-22 are pretty terrible aircraft,extremely unreliable,the former is heavily overpriced. They need to be tweaked(I hope)
-
TankHunter
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Tue 31 Jul 2012 06:00
- Contact:
Re: Super Etendard
IMO the Polish Su22 is very good to deal with NATO heavy armor, so good it can into space!
"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them [. . .] They sowed the wind, and now, they are going to reap the whirlwind."
Re: Super Etendant
Iris wrote:DDR:
The Super Nintendo won't one shot anything over 12 AV.
What frontal AV does a T-80B have?
I killed a bunch in one hit with Etendards the other day, no way those were all side shots.
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.
Re: Super Etendard
The L2A4 has to contend with T-80Us and ATgMs and Helicopters and now more jets to kill it, do so and buff the L2A4 availability.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests