destruction vs conquest decks

User avatar
Spektre
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri 10 Feb 2012 20:13
Location: germany
Contact:

destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Spektre » Mon 2 Sep 2013 19:26

what changes have you all done for conquest?
I still play my decks which worked best in destruction
and they work in conquest too... but I feel I have to slightly tune them

come one? what are your gadgets and tools for breakin through?
I see a lot more mlrs, medium tanks and napalm these days
WTF?

Tommoscimmia
First Sergeant
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed 10 Oct 2012 17:26
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Tommoscimmia » Mon 2 Sep 2013 19:50

more mlrs, more mobile AA, more CVs! :lol:
Solty wrote:Have you ever played ALB btw?

BassiveMollocks
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu 16 May 2013 14:19
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby BassiveMollocks » Mon 2 Sep 2013 19:54

As I play in a team, I take a CAT B NATO mixed deck. Reservists in cheap transports, lots of AA and mortars, cheiftans 2's, starships etc and napalm. I take large towns where reservists are useful when combined with napalm and cheap tanks.

User avatar
Spektre
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri 10 Feb 2012 20:13
Location: germany
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Spektre » Mon 2 Sep 2013 19:56

Tommoscimmia wrote:more mlrs, more mobile AA, more CVs! :lol:


:lol: thats what I mean

anything else different?
WTF?

User avatar
[EUG]MadMat
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 15499
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 13:31
Location: Paris, France.
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby [EUG]MadMat » Mon 2 Sep 2013 19:57

I find that more resilience is a good thing, hence early-era decks may be a good idea, especially in teamplay.

Kamil
Lieutenant
Posts: 1024
Joined: Thu 25 Apr 2013 22:43
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Kamil » Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:00

Making conquest deck you can simply count have points of income you ll have and put proper amount of units in Your deck and rest activation points use for backup AA, buratino, mlrs, napalm tanks more recon helis or just more jets.

User avatar
praslovan
Major-General
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 21:56
Location: Slav inhabited Alps
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby praslovan » Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:01

Jeep CVs (because there are more of them) and a tad less supplies.

rrev
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon 27 Feb 2012 20:19
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby rrev » Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:04

Yeah Cat B/C are good - if you're NATO that is. CAT B actually doesn't lose all that much compared to C. It's hellfire and the top heavy armor primarily. Much of everything else is actually "better" (as in heck of allot more of them)-

For conquest. Consider Command tank, extra defensive (=infantry, MLRS, ATGM vehicles/IFV's) units if you're faction is capable of taking ground early on (like west Germany), or extra offensive units (tanks with good stab, reliable & cost-worthy planes, MLRS still and good, cheap smoke units) if your faction is inherently very strong on the defense (Sweden for instance). But all this is very map/format dependent...

User avatar
Spektre
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri 10 Feb 2012 20:13
Location: germany
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Spektre » Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:31

[EUG]MadMat wrote:I find that more resilience is a good thing, hence early-era decks may be a good idea, especially in teamplay.


yes in a 3 vs 3 or 4 vs 4 its usefull if one goes early era
so you have cheaper stuff with higher vet and so u get that resilience too

I always forget to put in flamethrower inf... they do so good in forrests around spawns etc
WTF?

Forimar
Captain
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon 6 May 2013 01:27
Contact:

Re: destruction vs conquest decks

Postby Forimar » Mon 2 Sep 2013 20:48

I put in much more aggressive units in my conquest decks (AA helos, helo inf, napalm, spam tanks), since attacking in the early game becomes much more important in conquest. I also generally forgo jet fighters in conquest since they are not as versatile as a card of OSAs or HAWKs.

Return to “Wargame : AirLand Battle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests