Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.
Negative. And it should not be an APC. Eventually a transport for 2-man recon.
Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.
Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?
Killertomato wrote:Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.
The V-100 was basically for USAF security police and MPs only after Vietnam.
Deltas should realistically have M151s or humvees for ground transport.
QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.
HrcAk47 wrote:QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.
Why?
QUAD wrote:HrcAk47 wrote:QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.
Why?
They deserve to be represented ingame but are clearly different from APCs. They would be hyper cost efficient but not AP efficient. (Say 10 units of Dragoner in their current rover that's in recon tab.)
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests