Scharnberg wrote:mrl0ve wrote:Hartmann wrote:
Good job of actually responding to my arguments, instead of just waffling on about other things without even bothering to support your statements.
It's funny how people are actually taking the time out to try and write meaningful responses to this neverending stream of nonsense you call posts.
Typical that you are unable to provide replays. But then again what else is new right.
You mean arguments like "T-55A is the best tank in the game, you can kill every heavy and chopper, you just need to take sideshots, learn 2 micro noob"
thats basicly all that you people say just in another fashion, thats neither meaningful nor helpful,
while you can't answer to a simple question "why NATO have 20139 uber AP hardcounter atgms, while pact have to buy more expensive heavy tanks as response to heavy tanks"?
Ranked game before the same , NATO spams again a lot of abrams, challengers, leopard 2a4s, while our only way to counter it is bank for heavy tanks while they just attack every direction, covered by an chapral shield and marder rolands ..
the only way we won this was beeing surrounded close to main sector and hunting for "gaps" in their defense lines and better micro.. not to mention commando raid in their arty
beeing vastly outnumbered by high performance tanks doesn't help either...
why the hell i should buy a expensive atgm to counter medium vehicles ?..
NATO tanks aint better than PACT, The best NATO tank is the leopard 2a4 which you only get 4 of, Tanks which are equal to the Leopard 2a4 (145) are the T-64BV (135) and T-80A (130), they are a little bit worse but not much.
But then NATO should complain that Leopard 2 (100) are worse than T-72B1 (90)
The 2nd best NATO tank are either the M1A1 Abrams or the Challenger (I think the Challenger - more armour and you get 2 cards of 8 instead of 1 card of 4)
The M1A1 abrams (135) has 17 armor, big size, 11 acc, 19 ap. Its counterpart is also the T-64BV and the T-80A.
T-64BV has less acc, 1 less rear, top and side armour but has and ATGM which does 3-4 dmg to a M1A1 abrams if it hits. The T-64BV does 3 dmg at full gun range against the M1A1 abrams.
The T-80A has 1 less front, rear and top armour but has and ATGM which does 6-7 dmg to a M1A1 if it hits. The T-80A does 2 dmg at full range against the M1A1.
And finaly the challenger.
The challenger (130) has 19 front armour but only 17 AP and fire only 7 rounds per min. . Its counterparts are again the T-64BV and the T-80A.
The T-64BV does 1-2 dmg with ATGM and 1 dmg with gun at full Range against the Challenger.
The Challenger does 1 dmg with gun at full range against the T-64BV.
The T-80A does 4 dmg with ATGM and 1 dmg at 2100m range against the Challenger.
The Challenger does 1-2 dmg at full range against the T-80A
And USSR also gets the super tank which outranks every tank in game. THE T-80U
Too bad all these "super tanks" die to two squads of Milan
So i'm right it seems, you suggest me to counter nato heavies with more expensive pact heavies that dies to two nato missiles.. interessting.