NATO airspam

User avatar
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
General
Posts: 6605
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 11:40
Contact:

NATO airspam

Postby Grabbed_by_the_Spets » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:37

Is getting


Absolutely


Ridiculous


Yes, these are examples of how bad it can get, but this is becoming more and more common now, Huge air-rush by NATO forces (especailly France and US). that simply overwhelm you and with nothing you can do about it. It's starting to become common again seeing cheap helispam rushes but France and Mixed NATO, it's F-14 circles of doom are just as bad as they ever were, and nighthawks come in droves of 3-4 at a time...

Please revise the current air-to-ground combat system and vice-versa, especially for Pact minors, all the OSA's barley feel worth using ever since the pirce increase, and having two set's of radar missiles outraged by a common IR missile in both aircraft is starting to feel depressing. Kub's, Strela-10's and OSA's should be the bread and butter units, but right now NATO bombers are simply flying circles in them. It feels like Buk-M1 and Tunguska-M are the only viable AA unit's right now...

It's upsetting seeing all of your OSA's getting chewed up by hoards of Ravens like yesterdays dinner, but your SU-22MP4's unable to successfully shoot down two Roland's, having to fire last, and usually just getting shot down.

Also, last but not least please look into helo rushes! Celtics and Puma Pirates, or Lynx with Kiwoa currently rules all on any infantry themed map, with perhaps only Poland being able to stand up to them! Mi-8's are big, slow, expensive and just a death trap for anyone using them, Mi-2's and Mi-4's are SF only. and Hinds cost the same as most Gunships.

I feel right now Pact (or at least Pact minor) has absolutely no way of countering these, regardless of skill level and puts a real block onto the choices we have.
Image

User avatar
ElBubba
Warrant Officer
Posts: 415
Joined: Sat 6 Oct 2012 18:15
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby ElBubba » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:43

I would suggest posting replays of said games. A replay file tells more than a thousand words. Replays give everybody else a objective source to analyse what happened and how.
Image

User avatar
JBravo
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2419
Joined: Thu 17 May 2012 16:07
Location: Plymouth Rock
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby JBravo » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:47

A replay isn't really needed to prove that airspam is a problem right now.
Image

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby another505 » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:54

Raven spams with nighthawk coming behind is even getting worse...

most of the time I am willing to risk and lose a 170pt su27 just to kill a 135pt raven
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
Grabbed_by_the_Spets
General
Posts: 6605
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2012 11:40
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby Grabbed_by_the_Spets » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:55

Is there a host website I could put the replays on? I've got them on my computer stored right now...
Image

Majorpain
Master Sergeant
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun 26 May 2013 17:59
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby Majorpain » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:56

Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote: It feels like Buk-M1 and Tunguska-M are the only viable AA unit's right now...


Buk-M1.... Taking that you are guaranteed to get overrun by air at some points, by far the best solution is a mix of Manpads, IR AA and low tier higher availability buks. That gives you the highest flexibility against Raven/Nighthawk spam and Cat C/B Bomber spam.

French Jaguar makes Buk-M1 cry.

User avatar
Mikeboy
General
Posts: 5354
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 21:59
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby Mikeboy » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:57

Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:Is there a host website I could put the replays on? I've got them on my computer stored right now...


alb-replays.info

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6320
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby KattiValk » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:58

Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:Is there a host website I could put the replays on? I've got them on my computer stored right now...

http://alb-replays.info/#/

andy02m
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed 7 Mar 2012 17:10
Location: West Loop - Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby andy02m » Wed 15 Jan 2014 19:58

Grabbed_by_the_Spets wrote:Is getting


Absolutely


Ridiculous


Yes, these are examples of how bad it can get, but this is becoming more and more common now, Huge air-rush by NATO forces (especailly France and US). that simply overwhelm you and with nothing you can do about it. It's starting to become common again seeing cheap helispam rushes but France and Mixed NATO, it's F-14 circles of doom are just as bad as they ever were, and nighthawks come in droves of 3-4 at a time...

Please revise the current air-to-ground combat system and vice-versa, especially for Pact minors, all the OSA's barley feel worth using ever since the pirce increase, and having two set's of radar missiles outraged by a common IR missile in both aircraft is starting to feel depressing. Kub's, Strela-10's and OSA's should be the bread and butter units, but right now NATO bombers are simply flying circles in them. It feels like Buk-M1 and Tunguska-M are the only viable AA unit's right now...

It's upsetting seeing all of your OSA's getting chewed up by hoards of Ravens like yesterdays dinner, but your SU-22MP4's unable to successfully shoot down two Roland's, having to fire last, and usually just getting shot down.

Also, last but not least please look into helo rushes! Celtics and Puma Pirates, or Lynx with Kiwoa currently rules all on any infantry themed map, with perhaps only Poland being able to stand up to them! Mi-8's are big, slow, expensive and just a death trap for anyone using them, Mi-2's and Mi-4's are SF only. and Hinds cost the same as most Gunships.

I feel right now Pact (or at least Pact minor) has absolutely no way of countering these, regardless of skill level and puts a real block onto the choices we have.




Considering the number of times i've been curb stomped by USSR heli's please understand if I don't ...
Last edited by [DAY]Topspin2005 on Wed 15 Jan 2014 21:02, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Language

User avatar
ElBubba
Warrant Officer
Posts: 415
Joined: Sat 6 Oct 2012 18:15
Contact:

Re: NATO airspam

Postby ElBubba » Wed 15 Jan 2014 20:00

JBravo wrote:A replay isn't really needed to prove that airspam is a problem right now.

If you feel this way then would not posting replays of the "problem" only raise awareness and help pinpoint the cause of why it (airspam) is too effective?
Image

Return to “Wargame : AirLand Battle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests