It has the availability of a unit that costs half again as much, why?
It's a 60 pt unit, 4 per card is too low.
Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.
Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
What Kind of Deck? 4 is pretty good. I remember Chaparral in ALB at vetted you only got Two and they were like 35 points.
But compared to the other radar sams like Buk. 4 does seem low.
But compared to the other radar sams like Buk. 4 does seem low.

Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
Osa, Ihawk and Buk have 6 and are more expensive 

If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.
Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
No Euro for Germany, at Least the Coalition has the Rafael. But I know you get 4 Adats and Roland 3 isn't quite on par with that is it.

- CornProducts
- Colonel
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Mon 7 Apr 2014 06:48
- Contact:
- Markenzwieback
- Captain
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Tue 27 Oct 2015 17:06
- Contact:
Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
Bougnas wrote:6 avail for M48A3 and Roland 3?
Yes please. This should have happened a long time ago.

-
- Sergeant Major of the Army
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue 4 Nov 2014 06:35
- Contact:
Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
Mako wrote:It has the availability of a unit that costs half again as much, why?
It's a 60 pt unit, 4 per card is too low.
Because the Roland 3 is really good, especially at 65 points.
Re: Why is the Roland 3 still 4 per card?
Markenzwieback wrote:Bougnas wrote:6 avail for M48A3 and Roland 3?
Yes please. This should have happened a long time ago.
The entire chap line needs to go up by +2
Crotale has avail of 6 and it's a hell of a lot better in other aspects also (mobility, survival) than the M48A3 which is only 4
With rolands it gets trickier
Roland 3 definitely deserves +1 availability, not sure if +2
OSA AKM (6) vs roland 3 (4) have the same ranges but roland has 65% accuracy, osa has only 55% (osa has more mobility but roland has armor so let's say they're even)
Roland can only shoot 2 missiles before reloading but when you shoot at planes, you don't really need more anyway
Roland 2 (6) is the same story vs OSA-AK (8), 65% acc vs 50% acc, +1 is most definitely warranted, +2 maybe not so much
Roland 1 is already at 8 availability, compared to that Strela-10M has worse stats, availability of 6 and costs more despite roland having a 2.8 km range on helos unlike strela (2 shots before reload vs 4 shots before reload is more of an issue but I think that should affect price, roland is already cheaper, but should not make availability lower for the strela)
So seriously, on what grounds does crotale with 3.3km deserve the same availability as strela-10m
Either crotale needs to receive -1, or strela-10M +2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests