USA preparing for attack

User avatar
Vestly
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun 24 Mar 2013 14:19
Contact:

USA preparing for attack

Postby Vestly » Sat 24 Aug 2013 12:47

Hi , what do you think ?

Here is the vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9amEclGYBcs

Again USA just wants to steal oil. Who did use a chemical weapons ? Syrian army or CIA agents ?

User avatar
DeuZerre
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 11125
Joined: Mon 27 Feb 2012 23:17
Location: Universe, Galaxy, Solar System, Earth, Ground, Eurasian Continent, Main Landmass.
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby DeuZerre » Sat 24 Aug 2013 13:08

Best answer: Someone, and we'll never know.
Image
Marshal honoris causa
FLX wrote:Removing the weaknesses from the divisions leads to all divisions being the same in the long run. We won't proceed like that.

User avatar
mnkymanfoo
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed 3 Apr 2013 07:24
Location: Spokane, Inland Empire
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby mnkymanfoo » Sat 24 Aug 2013 13:23

Yup it was definitely CIA agents planning on stealing oil. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone who disagrees is most definitely on the payroll of the Mossad. This non-biased message brought to you by your friends at the GLA.

User avatar
Vestly
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun 24 Mar 2013 14:19
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby Vestly » Sat 24 Aug 2013 13:37

It looked , that they were prepared for this (Obama etc) , so they were just finding reason for invading it , without being a "aggressor"

rhylsadar
First Sergeant
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2012 01:43
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby rhylsadar » Sat 24 Aug 2013 13:42

mnkymanfoo wrote:Yup it was definitely CIA agents planning on stealing oil. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone who disagrees is most definitely on the payroll of the Mossad. This non-biased message brought to you by your friends at the GLA.


WTF ???

While i'm against meddling, my point of view about this crisis is a coalition should destroy all kind of chemical weapon site.

I'm ok with Syria to have some kind of deterrence weapon to protect their country, we have your nuclear warhead...
but here it's question about a gouvernement and its army against their own people even if that "revolution" seems against our interest, UN should not allow an army to mass butcher their own people, the work of an army is not to protect gouvernment but nation.

User avatar
DeuZerre
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 11125
Joined: Mon 27 Feb 2012 23:17
Location: Universe, Galaxy, Solar System, Earth, Ground, Eurasian Continent, Main Landmass.
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby DeuZerre » Sat 24 Aug 2013 14:02

rhylsadar wrote:
mnkymanfoo wrote:Yup it was definitely CIA agents planning on stealing oil. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone who disagrees is most definitely on the payroll of the Mossad. This non-biased message brought to you by your friends at the GLA.


WTF ???

While i'm against meddling, my point of view about this crisis is a coalition should destroy all kind of chemical weapon site.

I'm ok with Syria to have some kind of deterrence weapon to protect their country, we have your nuclear warhead...
but here it's question about a gouvernement and its army against their own people even if that "revolution" seems against our interest, UN should not allow an army to mass butcher their own people, the work of an army is not to protect gouvernment but nation.


He was making a joke.

The issue is that it's not that simple: Can you prove who used the weapon? Can you attack a country based on assumptions? Remember Irak: ATTACK BECAUSE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!§§§!!!

How many WMDs were found? 0. And it's not like you can hide a military missile silo like that.
Image
Marshal honoris causa
FLX wrote:Removing the weaknesses from the divisions leads to all divisions being the same in the long run. We won't proceed like that.

rhylsadar
First Sergeant
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2012 01:43
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby rhylsadar » Sat 24 Aug 2013 14:07

the difference is that attack of Irak was like 1 month after 09/11 here its 1 year and all nation have huge preamption about chemical use...

and yes... launcher pad are really hard to detect, unlike films

User avatar
Gronank
Colonel
Posts: 2516
Joined: Tue 8 Nov 2011 23:40
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby Gronank » Sat 24 Aug 2013 14:28

rhylsadar wrote:the difference is that attack of Irak was like 1 month after 09/11 here its 1 year and all nation have huge preamption about chemical use...

you do realise that when people talk about the September 11th, they talk about 2001, not 2003, right?
Image

User avatar
EricTerminator
Major
Posts: 1879
Joined: Tue 27 Mar 2012 18:16
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby EricTerminator » Sat 24 Aug 2013 14:32

mnkymanfoo wrote:Yup it was definitely CIA agents planning on stealing oil. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone who disagrees is most definitely on the payroll of the Mossad. This non-biased message brought to you by your friends at the GLA.


Dr. Thrax is very stronk !
BECAUSE HUNTING CHALLENGERS WITH MIG-31S WAS TOO EASY :


User avatar
mnkymanfoo
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed 3 Apr 2013 07:24
Location: Spokane, Inland Empire
Contact:

Re: USA preparing for attack

Postby mnkymanfoo » Sat 24 Aug 2013 14:35

EricTerminator wrote:
mnkymanfoo wrote:Yup it was definitely CIA agents planning on stealing oil. There is no other logical explanation. Anyone who disagrees is most definitely on the payroll of the Mossad. This non-biased message brought to you by your friends at the GLA.


Dr. Thrax is very stronk !


Finally someone got it.

Return to “Off-Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests