SEAD and ASF price Comparasion

User avatar
中铁四局
Warrant Officer
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2012 13:10
Contact:

SEAD and ASF price Comparasion

Postby 中铁四局 » Fri 16 May 2014 06:14

Pic worth 1000 words

Su-27SK vs. EF typhoon, OK......can Eugen swap the stats of these 2? :lol: 6 semi-active missile vs.godlike 4X F&F? MRAAM
Su-27SK vs. Typhoon.jpg
Su-27SK vs. Typhoon.jpg (117.58 KiB) Viewed 2496 times



Su-27SK vs. Murica F-16C block52 , Freedom discount with everything vastly superior? Again, with better MRAAM F&F missile
Yup, SU-27SK has 6x Semi Active missile, and does everyone know how suck the Semi Active missile performs compare to the F&F one?
SU-27SK vs. F-16C block52.jpg
SU-27SK vs. F-16C block52.jpg (117.36 KiB) Viewed 2496 times


Su-27PU vs. The mighty invincible Rafel, so rafel costs 10 pts less because of the stealth technology and more accuracy missile?
RAfelvs.SU-27PU.jpg
RAfelvs.SU-27PU.jpg (120.31 KiB) Viewed 2496 times
Last edited by 中铁四局 on Fri 16 May 2014 21:35, edited 2 times in total.
Dear Eugen, Please give T-72BU its iconic red-eye shtora system back! It looks mean and awesome!

User avatar
Awesome Cup
Master Sergeant
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed 5 Mar 2014 09:03
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby Awesome Cup » Fri 16 May 2014 06:16

You didn't factor in ECM, Speed, or turning radius.
Image

User avatar
中铁四局
Warrant Officer
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2012 13:10
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby 中铁四局 » Fri 16 May 2014 06:19

Naw,
Here's the Sead comparison, notice that most SAM unit has most 2 armor value, so there's a instant kill no matter the Sead missile is 20AP or 28AP

Mig-25BM vs The EF-111 Ninja, The EF-111's stealth technology makes it cheaper obviously.
Mig-25POS vs. EF-LOL.jpg
Mig-25POS vs. EF-LOL.jpg (98.27 KiB) Viewed 2486 times



Su-24 vs. Voodoo , OK voodoo has a availability of 3 per card in a commonwealth deck meanwhile all other SEADs only have a maxim availability of 2.
SU-24 vs. Vodo.jpg
SU-24 vs. Vodo.jpg (104.86 KiB) Viewed 2486 times


JH-7A FEIBAO vs. KF-16C Block52D , China needs to be punished for support NK in korea war.
feibao vs. KF-16.jpg
feibao vs. KF-16.jpg (120.07 KiB) Viewed 2486 times



We are satisfied by current balance? ! :lol:
Last edited by 中铁四局 on Fri 16 May 2014 21:39, edited 3 times in total.
Dear Eugen, Please give T-72BU its iconic red-eye shtora system back! It looks mean and awesome!

User avatar
中铁四局
Warrant Officer
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2012 13:10
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby 中铁四局 » Fri 16 May 2014 06:20

Awesome Cup wrote:You didn't factor in ECM, Speed, or turning radius.


Did you notice they are the same? If not the ECM is always higher in the glorious Justice blufor.
Dear Eugen, Please give T-72BU its iconic red-eye shtora system back! It looks mean and awesome!

User avatar
Mitchverr
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 10646
Joined: Sat 24 Mar 2012 18:08
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby Mitchverr » Fri 16 May 2014 06:24

You ignore number of missiles too.... and range...

The only legit complaints i can see really are against voodoo and KF-16C Block52D.
Image

User avatar
Sunshine
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2428
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2012 15:51
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby Sunshine » Fri 16 May 2014 06:24

OP, you just see what you want to see with your rage filled eyes.
I pity you, really.
This thread is so...bonkers.
Image
Sponsored by italic & German superiority.

User avatar
LoneRifle
Major-General
Posts: 3569
Joined: Wed 3 Jul 2013 17:11
Location: Cackalacky
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby LoneRifle » Fri 16 May 2014 06:25

Comparing an export version of an SU27 against the best tech Europe and American Aviation has to offer. Why am i not surprised the NATO planes are better?

The plane could use a price buff, although it DOES have 2 extra SA missiles to justify its current cost.
Last edited by BTR on Fri 16 May 2014 07:13, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Inflammatory content redacted.
Image

User avatar
中铁四局
Warrant Officer
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2012 13:10
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby 中铁四局 » Fri 16 May 2014 06:27

LoneRifle wrote:Comparing an export version of an SU27 against the best tech Europe and American Aviation has to offer. Why am i not surprised the NATO planes are better?

The plane could use a price buff, although it DOES have 2 extra SA missiles to justify its current cost.


It's 160pt vs 160pt, does Chinese gets more income in the game than its adversary?
Last edited by BTR on Fri 16 May 2014 07:13, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Quote redacted
Dear Eugen, Please give T-72BU its iconic red-eye shtora system back! It looks mean and awesome!

User avatar
中铁四局
Warrant Officer
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2012 13:10
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby 中铁四局 » Fri 16 May 2014 06:30

Sunshine wrote:OP, you just see what you want to see with your rage filled eyes.
I pity you, really.
This thread is so...bonkers.


Oh, wait? Did I PSed those screenshots? Or you can't even do a basic stat comparison? :lol:

Sry, as a 90% Win ratio player and 56% time playing NATO, I'm very very concerned about the game balance since BETA.

Or you can teach me how to play PACT? And using pact to prove me that I'm wrong?
Dear Eugen, Please give T-72BU its iconic red-eye shtora system back! It looks mean and awesome!

User avatar
RedDevilCG
Colonel
Posts: 2687
Joined: Thu 30 May 2013 20:58
Contact:

Re: The punishment of playing PACT (price comparasion)

Postby RedDevilCG » Fri 16 May 2014 06:37

So, I'm seeing that the RED planes either carry more munitions or they're longer range or both. Are you trying to show that Blue is underpowered?
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests